Prince and the Fight for Masters

Few artists have fought as publicly and passionately for artistic freedom as Prince. At the height of his career in the 1990s, Prince waged a fierce battle against Warner Bros, his record label, over ownership of his master recordings. In a move that stunned fans and the wider industry, he appeared in public with the word “slave” scrawled on his cheek and changed his name to an unpronounceable symbol.

‍

This was more than a stunt. It was a deliberate and radical protest against a system that Prince believed stripped artists of control over their own work. His battle with Warner Bros not only defined his career but also reshaped the debate around ownership in the music industry.

‍

The Background: Prince and Warner Bros

‍

Prince Rogers Nelson signed with Warner Bros in 1977 when he was just 19. The deal gave him a platform to showcase his extraordinary talents as a singer, songwriter, multi instrumentalist, and producer. His output in the 1980s,including 1999, Purple Rain, Around the World in a Day, and Sign o’ the Times, cemented him as one of the most influential artists of his generation.

‍

Prince was prolific. He recorded constantly, often producing more material than the label could release. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, tensions were growing. Warner Bros wanted to manage Prince’s output carefully, spacing albums to avoid oversaturating the market. Prince wanted the freedom to release as much music as he wished, believing his creativity should not be restrained by corporate schedules.

‍

Behind this creative clash was a deeper issue: ownership of the master recordings. Under his contract, Warner Bros owned the masters to Prince’s albums. This meant they controlled how the music was distributed and exploited, and Prince only received royalties from sales. The man who had written, performed, and produced his own music did not actually own it.

‍

The Dispute: Masters and Control

‍

By the early 1990s, the disagreement reached boiling point. Prince wanted ownership of his masters. Warner Bros refused, insisting that the company’s investment in Prince’s career justified their ownership. Prince also wanted to release albums more frequently than Warner would allow.

‍

Frustrated, Prince began to stage a protest unlike anything seen before. In 1993, he announced that he was changing his name to an unpronounceable symbol that combined elements of the male and female signs. Since Warner Bros still owned the name “Prince” as a trademark, the symbol was a way of separating his new work from the catalogue owned by the label.

‍

At the same time, Prince began appearing in public with the word “slave” written on his face. He argued that his contract with Warner Bros amounted to slavery because it denied him ownership of his own creations and forced him to conform to the company’s release schedule. To many, this was shocking. Prince was a wealthy superstar, yet he was comparing himself to enslaved people. But Prince’s protest was about principle: he believed that no artist should be deprived of control over their own art.

‍

Prince began releasing a flood of material through side projects and alternative channels. Between 1993 and 1996, he released albums at a rapid pace, sometimes under the symbol name, sometimes through independent arrangements. His aim was to fulfil his contractual obligations as quickly as possible, so he could move on from Warner Bros.

‍

The Outcome

‍

In1996, Prince released Emancipation, a three disc album marking his freedom from his Warner Bros contract. The title was no accident. Prince declared that he was now free to release music on his own terms. He went on to establish his own label, NPG Records, and explored innovative ways of distributing his work, including online sales long before digital platforms became mainstream.

‍

However, Warner Bros continued to own the masters of Prince’s earlier work, including his most famous albums. Prince continued to fight for these rights throughout his life. It was not until 2014 that he finally reached a new agreement with Warner Bros that returned control of his masters to him. This was a landmark victory, coming decades after his original contract had been signed.

‍

Prince’s persistence paid off. He had campaigned for years, often ridiculed in the press for his extreme methods, but ultimately succeeded in regaining what he saw as rightfully his.

‍

The Impact on the Industry

‍

Prince’s battle with Warner Bros became one of the most famous disputes in music history. It raised questions that continue to dominate the industry: Who should own the master recordings? How much control should labels have over an artist’s output? How far can contracts go in restricting creativity?

‍

His protests drew global attention to the issue of master ownership. Other artists began to question their own contracts and the fairness of giving up rights to labels. Prince’s fight laid the groundwork for later disputes, including Taylor Swift’s campaign to regain control of her masters in the 2010s.

‍

The case also illustrated how public protest can be a powerful tool. While the courts and contracts gave Warner Bros the upper hand, Prince’s symbolic actions — the name change, the word “slave,” and the rapid releases — shifted the debate in his favour. He made ownership amoral issue, not just a legal one.

‍

Finally, Prince demonstrated that alternative models were possible. His experiments with independent releases and direct fan engagement foreshadowed the digital revolution in music. While not all of his projects were commercially successful, they showed that artists could think beyond the label system.

‍

Lessons for Musicians Today

‍

Prince’s struggle offers several lasting lessons:

‍

• Master ownership matters. Owning your recordings gives you control over how they are used and ensures you benefit directly from their exploitation.

• Contracts are binding. Even global superstars struggled to break free from agreements they had signed. Artists must negotiate carefully at the outset.

• Public protest can shift the debate. Prince lost battles in the short term but ultimately won because he forced the industry to confront uncomfortable truths.

• Innovation is possible. By creating new ways to distribute his music, Prince paved the way for later artists to explore direct to fan models and digital platforms.